IMPACT Live!

 View Only
  • 1.  IMPACTful Discussions: A Sense of Community

    Posted 07-14-2025 15:28:00

    What is an example where you did/did not feel a sense of community in a professional setting? What was it about the situation that made you feel that way?



    ------------------------------
    Dennis Ebersole
    Professor
    Northampton CC retired
    Bethlehem PA
    ------------------------------


  • 2.  RE: IMPACTful Discussions: A Sense of Community

    Posted 07-15-2025 00:57:00

    Hi Dennis:

    Thanks much for your question.

    I have recently had positive and welcoming experiences in several ANet groups in AMATYC.

    The atmosphere of professional respect and collaboration has been so helpful for me -- each person is encouraged to be involved in making our part of the world a better place.

    The leadership has set great examples, and people have responded with contributions that have helped me engage as a professional on a deeper level.

    Shout out to Equity, Innovation, International, Placement/Assessment, Quant. Reasoning, and Statistics.



    ------------------------------
    Rick Powers
    Instructor
    Western Technical College
    La Crosse WI
    powersr@westerntc.edu
    ------------------------------



  • 3.  RE: IMPACTful Discussions: A Sense of Community

    Posted 07-17-2025 13:49:00

    Rick:

    Thank you for your reply.  I agree that it is very invigorating to work with ANets to improve math education.  The more I get involved with AMATYC, the more convinced I am that we have great members who want our input.  

    Dennis



    ------------------------------
    Dennis Ebersole
    Professor
    Northampton CC retired
    Bethlehem PA
    ------------------------------



  • 4.  RE: IMPACTful Discussions: A Sense of Community

    Posted 07-18-2025 07:14:00

    Prompt #1: What supports your involvement in professional growth and transformation communities? Is it structured department routines like weekly check-ins, attending regional or national conferences, engaging on social media, connecting through myAMATYC communities, or having regularly scheduled conversations with peers?

    Prompt #2: What is an example where you did/did not feel a sense of community in a professional setting? What was it about the situation that made you feel that way?

    These past 2 prompts sparked a realization about something I've found incredibly valuable: attending conferences as a collaborative cohort. For several years, I've had the opportunity to attend conferences with a group of about 10 colleagues from 5 different campuses. What made this experience so powerful wasn't just the individual sessions we attended, but the conversations we had afterward - processing ideas together, challenging each other's thinking, and figuring out how to apply what we learned to our specific contexts.

    Due to our teaching schedules across different campuses, we rarely have opportunities to communicate, connect, learn, process, and ideate together in our day-to-day work. These conference experiences became our primary vehicle for collaborative professional growth.

    This year, our college administration made two policy changes that seem counterintuitive to effective professional development:

    1. No more than 2 faculty can attend a conference with college support

    2. The college will no longer pay for professional association memberships

    I'm struggling with these decisions because they essentially dismantle the collaborative learning mechanism that was maximizing our conference investment. Instead of ten people returning energized with shared vocabulary and collaborative implementation plans, we'll now have isolated individuals trying to process and apply learning alone.

    The membership decision compounds this issue by cutting off the ongoing professional connections that sustain growth between conferences. Those associations provide the networks, resources, and continued learning opportunities that bridge the gaps between major events.

    I understand budget constraints are real, but I can't help feeling this is penny-wise and pound-foolish. The collaborative model we had was generating exponential returns on investment through shared learning, cross-pollination of ideas, and coordinated implementation efforts.

    I wonder: 

    Have others experienced similar policy shifts at their institutions? How have you responded?

    What alternative models might preserve collaborative learning while addressing budget concerns? (Rotating full support, partial funding models, virtual participation options?)

    How do you maintain that sense of professional community when institutional structures are reduced?

    I'm curious about your experiences and any creative solutions you've found for maintaining collaborative professional growth in challenging budget environments. The conversation from those two original prompts reminded me that we need both the structural support AND the authentic community connection to truly thrive professionally.

    What are your thoughts?



    ------------------------------
    Julie M. Phelps, Ph.D.
    Valencia College, East Campus
    Professor of Mathematics
    AMATYC Standards Committee Chair
    jphelps@valenciacollege.edu
    Office Phone: 407 582 2527
    Cell Phone: 321 689 3288
    ------------------------------



  • 5.  RE: IMPACTful Discussions: A Sense of Community

    Posted 07-19-2025 12:27:00

    Hi Julie, 

    To me, this is the most important / problematic paragraph in your message
         Due to our teaching schedules across different campuses, we rarely
         have opportunities to communicate, connect, learn, process, and
         ideate together in our day-to-day work. These conference experiences
         became our primary vehicle for collaborative professional growth.
    Departments and Colleges have to provide professional development to teachers (new and old).
    Things change:  curriculum (hopefully), technology, pedagogy, as well as the challenges teachers face in the classroom.
    Departments should be challenged with assuring quality control across campuses, and across sections of the same course. 
    Departments should be the vehicle that provides the most professional development by putting teachers together and creating dialogue to address the issues teachers face.
    We could never depend on AMATYC or any affiliate to provide everything teachers needed. We had to build and create opportunities for teachers to share ideas from conferences (or research) with colleagues.  The most meaningful way to do that, the most effective (in my opinion), is in a real-time mode where teachers work together to plan lessons and select techniques for their daily work.  The discussion should include what the most important learning outcomes are, what strategies to use to insure deep learning, what technology will aid in the learning, what assessment strategies to use, etc.   Those groups of teachers should also look at tests that will evaluate learning - do the tests measure what was most important to learn, to the go beyond routine manipulation, etc.
    The college has to recognize that it CANNOT afford to allow teachers to work independently and hope they grow professionally.  Teachers have to recognize they should be evaluated regularly and part of that evaluation is self-assessment through dialogue with others.
    Technology should allow for virtual and face-to-face meetings of teachers who teach the same course. Discussion can be frank and fruitful, but also difficult and demanding.  There will be differences of opinion and different ideas; that has to be ok and not personal. We are teachers and we too have to learn.
    Tell the dean - make it happen.

    Regards.



    ------------------------------
    Robert Kimball
    (retired)
    CARY NC
    ------------------------------