This semester, I moved to having grades be based on points instead of percentages. The mathematical calculation comes out to the same thing, but I think it's easier for students to understand where they are in the course at any given time (points earned out of points available thus far), whereas a weighted average can be confusing and difficult to understand. Another idea I learned from "Grading for Equity" by Joe Feldman is to use a minimum score of 50 instead of entering 0s on the 100 point scale. It acts as a safety net, where most people don't need it, but it prevents some students from getting themselves into a hole that makes recovery seem impossible.
I also offer that the cumulative final exam (we have a required common final) can replace their lowest test/assessment score, which several others have mentioned.
I'm planning on making the transition to proficiency grading, but it's going to take me a while to develop it and to make sure my admin is on board with me moving in that direction.
------------------------------
Jennifer Ackerman
Jefferson CTC
Louisville KY
------------------------------
Original Message:
Sent: 08-21-2022 14:21:21
From: Celeste Petersen
Subject: IMPACT in Action - Small Changes for Equity in Grading
What small changes have you made, or are you planning to make, in your grading policies to ensure a single missed item doesn't have too drastic an impact on a student's final grade? For example, do you drop the lowest one or two assignment grades or eliminate zeros from your grading process?
------------------------------
Celeste Petersen
Mathematics Instructor
Clatsop CC
Astoria OR
------------------------------