REFERENCES
Abell, M. L., Braddy, L., Ensley, D., Ludwig, L., & Soto, H. (2018). MAA Instructional practices guide. Washington, D.C: Mathematics Association of America (MAA). https://www.maa.org/programs-and-communities/curriculum%20resources/instructional-practices-guide
Albers, D. J., Loftsgaarden, D. 0., Rung, D. C., & Watkins, A. E. (1992). Statistical abstracts of undergraduate programs in the mathematical sciences and computer science in the United States, 1990-91 CBMS Survey (MAA Notes Number 23). Washington, DC: Mathematical Association of America.
American Mathematical Association of Two-Year Colleges. (1992). Guidelines for the academic preparation of mathematics faculty at two-year colleges (Report of the Qualifications Subcommittee of the Education Committee). Memphis, 'IN: Author. (Reprinted in The AMA1YC Review, 15(1), 40-49.)
American Mathematical Association of Two-Year Colleges. (1993). Guidelines for mathematics departments at two-yea, colleges (Report of the Two-Year College Mathematics Departments Subcommittee of the Education Committee). Memphis, TN: Author. (Reprinted in AMA1YC NEWS, 9(1), centerpiece.)
Becker, J. R., & Pence, B. J. (1994). The teaching and learning of college mathematics: Current status and future directions. In J. J. Kaput & E. Dubinsky (Eds.), Research issues in undergraduate mathematics learning (pp. 5-14). Washington, DC: Mathematical Association of America.
Benson-O'Connor, C. D., McDaniel, C., & Carr, J. (2019). Bringing Math to Life: Provide Students Opportunities to Connect Their Lives to Math. Networks: An Online Journal for Teacher Research, 21(2), 3.
Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (2005). Changing teaching through formative assessment: Research and practice. Formative assessment: Improving learning in secondary classrooms, 223-240.
Blonder, B., Bowles, T., De Master, K., Fanshel, R. Z., Girotto, M., Kahn, A., …Rodriguez, M. (2022). Advancing Inclusion and Anti-Racism in the College Classroom: A rubric and resource guide for instructors. Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5874656
Bookman, J. (1994, June). Final Report: Evaluation of Project CALC 1989- 1993 (National Science Foundation grant # DUE - 8953961 ). Paper presented at the Third Conference on the Teaching of Calculus, Ann Arbor, MI.
Brophy, J., & Good, T. L. (1986). Teacher behavior and student achievement. In M. C. Whitrock (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (3rd ed., pp. 328-375). New York: Macmillan.
Brown, C. A., & Borko, H. (1992). Becoming a mathematics teacher. In D. A. Grouws (Ed.), Handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 209-239). New York: Macmillan.
Burrill, G., Choate, J., Phillips, E., & Westegaard, S.(Conference Organizers). (1993). Algebra/or the twenty-first century: Proceedings of the August 1992 conference. Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
Carlson, M., Jacobs, S., Coe, E., Larsen, S., & Hsu, E. (2002). Applying Covariational Reasoning While Modeling Dynamic Events: A Framework and a Study. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 33(5), (p. 352). https://doi.org/10.2307/4149958
Choppin, J.M. (1994). Spiral through recursion. Mathematics Teacher, 87,504-508.
Collins, T. W., Gentry, D. K., & Crawley, V. 0. (Co-Chairs). (1993). Gaining the competitive edge: Critical issues in science and engineering technician education (A report from a workshop sponsored by the National Science Foundation and the Federal Coordinating Council for Science, Engineering, and Technology). Washington, OC: National Science Foundation.
Common Core State Standards Initiative (CCSSI) (2012). Common core state standards for mathematics. http://www.corestandards.org/the-standards/mathematics
Conference Board of Mathematical Sciences (CBMS) (2016). Active Learning in Post-Secondary Mathematics Education. https://www.cbmsweb.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/07/active_learning_statement.pdf
Crocker, D. A. (1990). What has happened to calculus reform? The AMA1YC Review, 12(1), 62-66.
Crocker, D. A. (1991). Constructivism and mathematics education. The AMA1YC Review, 13(1), 66-70.
Crocker, D. A. (1992). Cooperative learning. The AMA1YC Review, 14(1), 78-83.
Davis, R. M. (Ed.). (1989). A curriculum influx: Mathematics at two-year colleges (A report of the Joint Subcommittee on Mathematics Curriculum at Two-Year Colleges). Washington, OC: Mathematical Association of America.
Demana, F. (1990). Improving college readiness through school/university articulation. In N. Fisher, H. Keynes, & P. Wagreich (Eds.), Mathematicians and education reform: Proceedings of the July 6-8, 1988 workshop (pp. 131-144). Providence, RI: American Mathematical Society.
Demana, F. (1994). College precalculus courses: Challenges and change. In A. Solow (Ed.), Preparing/or a new calculus (pp. 14-20). Washington, OC: Mathematical Association of America.
Dossey, J. A. (1991). Discrete mathematics: The math of our time. In M. J. Kenney & C. R. Hirsch (Eds.), Discrete mathematics across the curriculum, K-12: 1991 yearbook of the National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (pp. J-9). Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
Druckman, D., & Bjork, R. A (Eds.). (1994). Learning, remembering, believing: Enhancing human performance. Committee on Techniques for the Enhancement of Human Performance, National Research Council. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
Dunham, P.H. (1993, May). Does using calculators work? The jury is almost in. UME Trends, p. 8.
Dunham, P.H., & Dick, T. P. (1994). Research on graphing calculators. Mathematics Teacher; 87, 440-445.
Eisenberg, T., & Dreyfus, T. (1994). On understanding how students learn to visualize function transformations. In E. Dubinsky, AH. Schoenfeld, & J. Kaput (Eds.), Research in collegiate mathematics education I, (pp. 45-68). Providence, RI: American Mathematical Society.
Evans, J. (2002). Adults’ Mathematical Thinking and Emotions (p. 236). Routledge. (Original work published 2000)
Foley, G.D. (1990). Accessing advanced concepts with technology. The AMATYC Review, 11(2), 58-64.
Freudenthal, H. (1991). Revisiting mathematics education: China lectures. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer.
GAISE College Report ASA Revision Committee, Guidelines for Assessment and Instruction in Statistics Education (GAISE) College Report 2016. https://www.amstat.org/docs/default-source/amstat-documents/gaisecollege_full.pdf
Gardiner, A D. (1991). A cautionary note. In M. J. Kenney & C. R. Hirsch (Eds.), Discrete mathematics across the curricul.um, K-12: 1991 yearbook of the National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (pp. 10-17). Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
Gehrtz, J., Brantner, M. & Andrews, T.C. (2022). How are undergraduate STEM instructors leveraging student thinking?. International Journal of STEM Education, 9(1), 1-20. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-022-00336-0
Goldblatt, A (1994, May). Undergraduate remedial mathematics: Can it be remedied? UME Trends, p. 7.
Goldstein, J. A (Chair). (1989). Mathematics appreciation courses. In L. A. Steen (Ed.), Reshaping college mathematics (109- 125). Washington, DC: Mathematical Association of America. (A reedited version of the report of the CUPM Panel on Mathematics Appreciation Courses originally published in the American Mathematical Monthly, Vol. 90 (1983), pp. 40- 51 and the Center Section.)
Gordon, F. S. (1995). Assessing how well precalculus students do while Functioning in the Real World. PRIMUS, 5, 253-263.
Haney, B., & Testone, S. (1990). After semester workshop for developmental mathematics. The AMATYC Review 11 (2), 54-56.
Hart, E.W. (1991). Discrete mathematics: An exciting and necessary addition to the secondary school curriculum. In M. J. Kenney & C.R. Hirsch (Eds.), Discrete mathematics across the curriculum, K-12: 1991 yearbook of the National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (pp. 67-77). Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
Haver, W., & Turbeville, G. (1995). An appropriate culminating mathematics course. The AMATYC Review, 16 (2), 45-50.
Hector, J.H. (1992). Graphical insights into elementary functions. In J. T. Fey & C.R. Hirsch (Eds.), Calculators in mathematics education (pp. 131-137), 1992 Yearbook of the National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics
Hiebert, J., & Carpenter, T. P. (1992). Learning and teaching with understanding. In D. A. Grouws (Ed.),Handbook of research on mathematics teaching and Learning (pp. 65-97). New York: Macmillan.
Hiebert, J., & Lefevre, P. (1986). Conceptual and procedural knowledge in mathematics: An introductory analysis. In J. Hiebert (Ed.), Conceptual and procedural knowledge: The case of mathematics (pp. 1–27). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
İncikabi, S. (2017). Multiple representations and teaching mathematics: An analysis of the mathematics textbooks. Cumhuriyet International Journal of Education, 6(1), 66-81.
Keith, S.Z., & Leitz.el, J. R. C. (1994, May). General education mathematics: A new challenge for departments. UME Trends, 6-7.
Knill, O. (2009, February 14). On the Harvard Consortium Calculus. https://people.math.harvard.edu/~knill/pedagogy/harvardcalculus/
Laursen, S. L., & Rasmussen, C. (2019). I on the prize: Inquiry approaches in undergraduate mathematics. International Journal of Research in Undergraduate Mathematics Education, 5(1), 129-146.
Leitzel, J. R. C. (Ed.). (1991). A call for change: Recommendations for the mathematical preparation of teachers of mathematics. Washington, DC: Mathematical Association of America.
Madison, B. L. (Chair). (1995). Assessment of student learning for improving the undergraduate major in mathematics. (Prepared by the Mathematical Association of America Subcommittee on Assessment of the Committee on the Undergraduate Programs in Mathematics). Focus, 15 (3), 24-28.
Mathematical Association of America. (1993). Guidelines for programs and departments in undergraduate mathematical sciences. Washington, DC: Author.
Mathematical Sciences Education Board. (1990). Reshaping school mathematics. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
Mathematical Sciences Education Board. (1991). For good measure. (Report of the National Summit on Mathematics Assessment). Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
Mathematical Sciences Education Board. (1993). Measuring up. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
Megginson, R. E. (1994). A gateway testing program at the University of Michigan. In A. Solow (Ed.), Preparing fora new calculus (pp. 85-88). Washington, DC: Mathematical Association of America.
Mesterson-Gibbons, M. (1989). A concrete approach to mathematical modeling. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
Moore, C.C. (Chair). (1994). Recognition and rewards in the mathematical sciences. (Report of the Joint Policy Board for Mathematics Committee on Professional Recognition and Rewards). Providence, RI: American Mathematical Society.
National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (1989). Curriculum and evaluation standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA: Author.
National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (1991). Professional standards for teaching mathematics. Reston, VA: Author.
National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (1995). Assessment standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA: Author.
National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (NCTM). (2000). Principles and Standards for School Mathematics. Reston, VA.
National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (NCTM). (2014). Principles to actions: Ensuring mathematical success for all.
National Research Council (NRC). (1989). Everybody counts: A report to the nation on the future of mathematics education. National Academies Press.
National Research Council. (1990). A challenge of numbers. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
National Research Council. (1991). Moving beyond myths: Revitalizing undergraduate mathematics. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
National Science Foundation. (1991). Matching actions and challenges: Report of a National Science Foundation workshop on science, engineering and mathematics education in two-year colleges. Washington, DC: Author.
National Science Foundation. (1992). Partners in progress: Report of a National Science Foundation workshop on the role of professional societies in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics education in two-year colleges. Washington, DC: Author.
Newton, K. J., Lange, K., & Booth, J. L. (2020). Mathematical flexibility: Aspects of a continuum and the role of prior knowledge. The Journal of Experimental Education, 88(4), 503-515. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220973.2019.1586629
Paris, D, & Alim, H. S. (Eds.). (2017) Culturally Sustaining Pedagogies: Teaching and Learning for Justice in a Changing World. Teachers College Press.
Pfannkuch, M., Ben-Zvi, D., & Budgett, S. (2018). Innovations in statistical modeling to connect data, chance and context. ZDM, 50(7), 1113–1123. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-018-0989-2
Pollak, H. (I 987, May). Presentation at the Mathematical Sciences Education Board Frameworks Conference, Minneapolis, MN. Reich, R. P. (1993). Strategies for a changing workforce. Educational Record, 74 (4), 22-23.
Purcell, B. M. (2014). Use of Formative Classroom Assessment Techniques in a Project Management Course. Journal of Case Studies in Accreditation and Assessment, 3.
Reich, R. P. (1993). Strategies for a changing workforce. Educational Record, 74 (4), 22-23.
Resnick. L.B. (1989). Introduction. In L.B. Resnick (Ed.), Knowing, learning and instruction: Essays in honor of Robert Glaser(pp. 1-24). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Resnick, L. B., & Klopfer. L. E. (1989). Toward the thinking curriculum: An overview. In L. B. Resnick & L. E. Klopfer (Eds.), Toward the thinking curriculum: Current Cognitive Research (pp. 1-18). (1989 Yearbook of the American Society for Curriculum Development). Washington, DC: American Society for Curriculum Development.
Rittle-Johnson, B., & Star, J. R. (2007). Does comparing solution methods facilitate conceptual and procedural knowledge? An experimental study on learning to solve equations. Journal of Educational Psychology, 99(3), 561-574.
Ross, S. C. (Ed.). (1994, January). NSF Beat: $2.1 million in NSF calculus grants. UME Trends, pp. 1, 10, and 15.
Saxe, K., Braddy, L., Bailer, J., Farinelli, R., Holm, T., & Mesa, V. (2015). A common vision for undergraduate mathematical sciences programs in 2025.
Schoenfeld, A.H. (1992). Learning to think mathematically: Problem solving, metacognition, and sense making in mathematics. In D. A. Grouws (Ed.), Handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 334-370). New York: Macmillan.
Secada, W. G. (1992). Race, ethnicity, social class, language, and achievement in mathematics. In D. A. Grouws (Ed.), Handbook on research in mathematics education (pp. 623-660). New York: Macmillan.
Secretary's Commission on Achieving Necessary Skills. (1991). What work requires of schools: A SCANS report for America Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Labor.
Secretary's Commission on Achieving Necessary Skills. (1993). Teaching the SCANS competencies. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Labor.
Selden, A., & Selden, J. (1994, March). Mathematics education displays breadth in Cincinnati. UME Trends, pp. 4-5.
Sharma, S. (2015). Promoting Risk Taking in Mathematics Classrooms: 6e importance of Creating a Safe Learning Environment, eMathematics Enthusiast, 12(1), Article 24. https://doi.org/10.54870/1551-3440.1349
Shoaf-Grubbs, M. M. (1994). The effect of the graphing calculator on female students' spatial visualization skills and level-of understanding in elementary graphing and algebra concepts. In E. Dubinsky, A. H. Schoenfeld, & J. Kaput (Eds.), Research in collegiate mathematics education, I (pp. 169-194). Providence, RI: American Mathematical Society.
Shupe, J. F. (Project Director & Chief Cartographer), Dorr, J. F. (Art Director), Payne, 0. G. A. M. (Text Ed.), Hunsiker, M. B. (Chief, Map Research) et al. (1992). National Geographic atlas of the world (rev. 6th ed.). Washington, DC: National Geographic Society.
Siegel, M. J. (Chair). (1989). Discrete mathematics. In L.A. Steen (F.cl.), Reshaping college mathematics (pp. 61-84). Washington, DC: Mathematical Association of America (A re-edited 1986 committee report of the Mathematical Association of America ad hoc Committee on Discrete Mathematics.)
Silver, E. A. (1994). Mathematics thinking and reasoning for all students: Moving from rhetoric to reality. In D. F. Robitaille, D. H. Wheeler, & C. Kieran (Eds.), Selected lectures from the 7th International Congress on Mathematical Education (pp. 311-326). Sainte-Foy, Quebec, Canada: Les Presses de l'Universite Laval.
Smith, W. M., Voigt, M., Ström, A., Webb, D. C., & Martin, W. G. (Eds.). (2021). Transformational change efforts: Student engagement in mathematics through an institutional network for active learning (Vol. 138). American Mathematical Soc.
Solow, A. (Ed.). (1994). Preparing for a new calculus. Washington, DC: Mathematical Association of America.
Sons, L. R. (Chair). (1995). Quantitative reasoning for college graduates: A complement to the Standards. (Report of the CUPM Subcommittee on Quantitative Literacy). Washington, DC: Mathematical Association of America.
Star, J. R., Rittle-Johnson, B. (2008). Flexibility in problem solving: The case of equation solving. Learning and instruction, 18(6), 565-579. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2007.09.018
Steen, L.A. {Ed.). (1989). Reshaping college mathematics. Washington, DC: Mathematical Association of America.
Steen, L.A. (1990). Pattern. In L.A. Steen (F.cl.), On the shoulders of giants (pp. 1-10). Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
Steinberg, R., Haymore, J., & Marks, R. (1985). Teachers' knowledge and structuring content in mathematics. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago.
Stevens, J. (1993). Generating and analyzing data. Mathematics Teacher, 86,475-487.
Swetz, F. (1991). Incorporating mathematical modeling into the curriculum. Mathematics Teacher, 84, 358-365.
Tall, D. (1992). The Transition to advanced mathematical thinking: Functions, limits, infinity and proof. In D. Grouws (Ed.), Handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 495–511). MacMillan Publishing Company.
Tidmore, G. (1994, June). A comparison of calculus materials used at Baylor University. Paper presented at the Third Conference on the Teaching of Calculus, Ann Arbor, MI.
Thompson, P. W. (1994). Students, functions, and the undergraduate curriculum. In E. Dubinsky, A.H.Schoenfeld, & J. Kaput (Eds.), Research in collegiate mathematics education I (pp. 21-44). Providence, RI: American Mathematical Society.
Treisman, U. (1992). Studying students studying calculus: A look at the lives of minority mathematics students in college (a Mary P. Dolciani lecture). College Mathematics Journal, 23, 362-372.
Tucker, A. C., & Leitzel, J. R. C. (1994). Assessing calculus reform efforts. Washington, DC: Mathematical Association of America.
Ursini, S. & Trigueros, M. (1997). Understanding of different uses of variable: a study with starting college students. In E. Pehkonen (Ed.), Proceeding of the 21st Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (Vol. 4, pp. 254-261). Lahti, Finland: PME.
U.S. Department of Education. (1990, July). National goals for education. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
Van Sertima, I. (Ed.). (1989). Blacks in science, ancient and modem. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Books.
Yale University Poorvu Center for Teaching Learning. (n.d.) Formative and Summative Assessments. Retrieved January 10, 2024 from https://poorvucenter.yale.edu/Formative-Summative-Assessments
Yeh, C., & Otis, B. M. (2019). Mathematics for Whom: Reframing and Humanizing Mathematics. Occasional Paper Series, 2019(41), 8.
Zaslavsky, C. (1994). Fear of math. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.